Home Learning date 19/10/2020 Study STD 3 to 8 materials video DD Girnar/Diksha portal video.The number of publications in cognitive linguistics has reached the point that keeping up with them all is no longer a realistic objective. Ronald W. Langacker’s Grammar and Conceptualization is therefore a welcome addition to the existing bibliography, as it aims to provide an accessible collection of representative and significant writings showing the continued development of the theory and further illustrating its application to diverse problems. The volume brings together twelve articles (not all easily accessible) published by Langacker himself between 1992 and 1999. All have been adapted to make this a cohesive work, the revisions ranging from slight adjustments to almost complete rewriting. The result is a volume which is meant to be readable as an integral whole, though at the same time each individual chapter can be read and understood as a self-contained entity. The first three chapters are introductory, providing a basic description of the framework, discussion of its methodology, and illustrations of its application to somerepresentative descriptive problems, like the meaning and uses of the preposition of.
The next two chapters are extensive treatments of theoretical issues like the nature and implications of a usage-based approach, and the status and characterization of constituency. The six chapters that follow offer detailed descriptions of particular grammatical phenomena, among them the parallelism between perception and conception, generic and habitual expressions, pronominal anaphora, grammaticization and raising constructions. Chapter 10, on grammaticization, documents a common path of grammaticization involving subjectification and the attenuation of an agent’s control, as in constructions with be going to, have, English modals, get-passives and Spanish estar ‘be’. The chapter refines Langacker’s earlier characterizations of subjectification, as expounded, among other places, in his seminal article in Cognitive Linguistics 1 [1990]. With Akio Kamio and Ken-ichi Takami, eds., Function and Structure, we move from cognitive to functional linguistics. The volume is a collection of thirteen papers in honour of Susumu Kuno, the founder of a specific stream of functionalism ultimately inspired by Prague School linguists but linked, unlike some otherfunctional schools, with the American formalist approach of generative grammar. Seven of the contributions in this collection are on functional syntax and six on other topics, while the data discussed come from languages such as English, Italian, French, Russian, Korean and Japanese. The papers on English include ‘A Comparison of Postposed Subjects in English and Italian’ by Gregory Ward, who discusses the pragmatics of existential (there’s a problem) and presentational (there arrived a man) there-sentences and compares them with Italian sentences involving existential ci (c’è un segreto istruttorio ‘there’s a secret inquest’) and subject postposing (era salita tua sorella sull’autobus ‘your sister got on the bus’). English presentational there-sentences and the two Italian constructions are sensitive to the discourse status of the postposed constituent, which must be new information, whereas existential there-sentences are constrained to represent entities that are hearer-new, i.e. not already familiar to the hearer. In ‘A Functional Constraint on Extraposition from NP’, Ken-ichi Takami shows that the acceptability of a wide range of sentences involving extraposition from NP depends on the functional constraint known as the More/Less Important Information Condition: extraposition is only possible if it crosses elements conveying unimportant information, as in John drove a car in London with a sunroof, as opposed to the unacceptable *John drove a car carefully with a sunroof. Also concerned with English are ‘A Context-Based Account of English Passives with Indefinite Subjects’ by Aiko Utsugi; ‘Specific NP in Scope’, by Becky Kennedy, who examines sentences like Bill didn’t see a misprint, where the second NP may receive a specific interpretation (i.e. ‘there’s a misprint that Bill didn’t see’, versus the non-specific ‘Bill saw no misprints’); and ‘Some Referential Properties of it and that’ by Akio Kamio and Margaret Thomas,who account for some of the contrasts in use between it and that by arguing that itrefers broadly to information already known and already entered into the speaker’scentral store of knowledge, while that points narrowly to incoming information thatmay be either novel or familiar, and is in some sense more peripherally located in thespeaker’s knowledge.
click here......
DATE-19-10-20 STD-3 HOME LEARNING.
DATE-19-10-20 STD-4 HOME LEARNING.
DATE-19-10-20 STD-5 HOME LEARNING.
DATE-19-10-20 STD-6 HOME LEARNING.













